Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Coffee

Dozing during court has become such a common occurrence that some jurisdictions use a three-step analysis to determine whether sleeping constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel:

1. Did counsel sleep for repeated and/or prolonged lapses?
2. Was counsel actually unconscious?
3. Were the defendant's interests at stake while counsel was asleep?

5 comments:

Lawyerlike said...

That is... amazing.

Anonymous said...

Citation?

(I enjoy your blog, by the way)

Lawyerlike said...

I like how step 2 of this test posits an even more interesting question, such as the level of consciousness during sleep.

Step 4: is life but a waking dream?

Anonymous said...

Step 5: ???
Step 6: PROFIT!

Sansserif said...

Hah! #2 was my fave too. Will post cite soon.

I also remember that 99% of all ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unsuccessful.

Step 7: Get suit dismissed!