Monday, January 29, 2007

The Parties Are Advised...

Remember that song "Barbie Girl" by Aqua? Matel sued them. Following the more relevant issues of trademark dilution, Judge Kozinski's concluding passage (the last line in particular) got a grin out of me:

After Mattel filed suit, Mattel and MCA employees traded barbs in the press. When an MCA spokeswoman noted that each album included a disclaimer saying that Barbie Girl was a "social commentary [that was] not created or approved by the makers of the doll," a Mattel representative responded by saying, "That's unacceptable.... It's akin to a bank robber handing a note of apology to a teller during a heist. [It n]either diminishes the severity of the crime, nor does it make it legal." He later characterized the song as a "theft" of "another company's property."

MCA filed a counterclaim for defamation based on the Mattel representative's use of the words "bank robber," "heist," "crime" and "theft." But all of these are variants of the invective most often hurled at accused infringers, namely "piracy." No one hearing this accusation understands intellectual property owners to be saying that infringers are nautical cutthroats with eyepatches and peg legs who board galleons to plunder cargo. In context, all these terms are nonactionable "rhetorical hyperbole." The parties are advised to chill.

Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. 296 F.3d 894, 9th Circuit, 2002.

1 comment:

Butterflyfish said...

"The parties are advised to chill."

That is awesome